IS

Grisot, Miria

Topic Weight Topic Terms
0.163 critical realism theory case study context affordances activity causal key identifies evolutionary history generative paper
0.146 complexity task environments e-business environment factors technology characteristics literature affect influence role important relationship model
0.138 standards interorganizational ios standardization standard systems compatibility effects cooperation firms industry benefits open interoperability key
0.127 research researchers framework future information systems important present agenda identify areas provide understanding contributions using
0.108 systems information research theory implications practice discussed findings field paper practitioners role general important key

Focal Researcher     Coauthors of Focal Researcher (1st degree)     Coauthors of Coauthors (2nd degree)

Note: click on a node to go to a researcher's profile page. Drag a node to reallocate. Number on the edge is the number of co-authorships.

Aanestad, Margunn 1 Hanseth, Ole 1 Jacucci, Edoardo 1
electronic patient records 1 reflexive moderation 1 side effects 1 socio-technical theory 1
Standards 1

Articles (1)

REFLEXIVE STANDARDIZATION: SIDE EFFECTS AND COMPLEXITY IN STANDARD MAKING. (MIS Quarterly, 2006)
Authors: Abstract:
    This paper addresses the general question proposed by the call of this special issue: "What historical or contingent events and factors influence the creation of ICT standards, and in particular, their success or failure?" Based on a case study conducted over a period of three years in a Norwegian hospital on the standardization process of an electronic patient record (EPR), the paper contributes to the current discussion on the conceptualization of standard-making in the field of Information Systems. By drawing upon the concepts of logic of ordering adopted from actor-network theory and upon reflexivity and the unexpected side effects adopted from reflexive modernization, the paper makes three key contributions: (1) it demonstrates the socio-technical complexity of IS standards and standardization efforts; (2) it shows how complexity generates reflexive processes that undermine standardization aims; and (3) it suggests a theoretical interpretation of standardization complexity by using ideas from complexity theory and the theory of reflexive modernization. These research questions are addressed by offering an historical and contingent analysis of the complexity dynamics emerging from the case.